Long-Term
Decennial Pattern & Performance
The table averages market performance for each calendar year ending in the same digit and shows how often those years closed up or down. We’re now in a year ending in 5, which has historically been the best-performing of the lot. Out of nine such years, the market closed higher eight times.
Please note that the up/down counts in the table reflect only the direction of the yearly close and do not distinguish between small or large gains or losses. A year marked as “up” may include increases as minimal as 0.1%.
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
| Avg % | 1.34% | 1.38% | 0.64% | 16.27% | 7.97% | 22.05% | 9.41% | 1.49% | 10.07% | 10.37% |
| Up/Down | 5/5 | 5/5 | 6/4 | 8/2 | 7/3 | 8/1 | 7/2 | 6/3 | 7/3 | 7/3 |
Kitchin Cycle
The Kitchin Cycle is a short-term business cycle lasting approximately 40.68 months, or about 3.4 years. First identified by economist Joseph Kitchin in the 1920s, it reflects recurring fluctuations in production and inventories. These cycles are driven by delays in information flow and business decision-making — companies respond to market signals with a lag, often overcorrecting by overproducing or underproducing. The result is a rhythmic, short-term economic pulse, distinct from longer cycles like Juglar or Kondratiev waves. Source: Technical Analysis Explained – Martin J. Pring.
| Last Forecast Date | Type | Actual Date | Actual Direction | Next Peak | Next Valley |
| 09/04/2025 | Valley | 07/04/2025 | Up untill next peak | 23/04/2027 | 08/12/2028 |
Presidential Cycle
Post-Election Year (Year 1):
The first year after an election often begins on a shaky footing. Investors face uncertainty as the new or continuing administration rolls out its agenda, which can spark heightened volatility. Markets tend to struggle in the early months, moving in a sluggish, uneven fashion before finding a firmer footing into late spring and summer. That rally phase is usually short-lived, as the market frequently rolls over into a sharp correction in the autumn months. By the end of the year, however, stocks often stabilize and manage to recover a portion of the earlier decline, leaving the overall year mixed or modestly positive.
January Barometer

This is a modified interpretation of the classic January Barometer originally introduced by Yale Hirsch, which states: “As goes the S&P in January, so goes the year.” In this version, the focus shifts away from absolute direction and instead emphasizes potential inflection points, changes in trajectory, and the steepness of price movements. The directional bias of individual segments is intentionally disregarded, as historical reliability on that front remains questionable.
The core concept involves extrapolating January’s behavioral pattern across the entire calendar year — essentially “stretching” the market’s movements from January and projecting that rhythm through to December, as a framework for observing possible structural or psychological echoes in market behavior.
My Yearly Market Blueprint

This represents my yearly forecast. As noted earlier, the projected turning points have shown a reasonable degree of reliability — though, regrettably, the same cannot be said for directional accuracy. The blue line reflects the original forecast published in December 2024, the green line marks the revised outlook, and the red line tracks actual market behavior. Updated at EOM.
Mid-Term
Seasonal Patterns

Source: The Research Driven Investor by Timothy Hayes
The chart below illustrates the stock market’s seasonal tendencies — its historical propensity to rise or fall during each calendar month. We’ll use this as the primary basis for establishing a mid-term directional bias.
Note: While the chart on the left is based on the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the accompanying monthly performance table reflects data from the S&P 500. Similar to the yearly performance table above, keep in mind the usual caveats — seasonal patterns can inform bias, but they’re far from guarantees.
| JAN | FEB | MAR | APR | MAY | JUN | JUL | AUG | SEP | OCT | NOV | DEC | |
| Avg. | 1.2% | -0.2% | +0.4% | +1.1% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +1.4% | +0.5% | -1.1% | +0.5% | +0.9% | +1.2% |
| % Up | 61% | 53% | 60% | 62% | 61% | 58% | 61% | 58% | 46% | 58% | 60% | 73% |
Sector Signals and Relative Strength
DJU

The Dow Jones Utilities Average (DJU) is used here as a leading indicator for potential weakness in the broader equity markets. While I can’t recall the original source of this idea, I’ll be sure to credit the author if and when it comes back to me. Through observation and analysis, I’ve found that the DJU often signals prolonged periods of market weakness approximately three months in advance of major indices like the S&P 500. This lead time is an average — typically around 55 trading days — with a buffer of roughly ±1 week to account for variability.
SPXEW

Historically, divergence between the S&P 500 and broader measures such as the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (SPXEW) has often served as an early warning signal for upcoming corrections in the S&P 500. While the S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, giving more influence to the largest companies, the SPXEW treats all 500 constituents equally, offering a more balanced view of overall market participation. These divergences tend to be more reliable when signaling tops rather than bottoms. Tops usually form gradually, allowing time for divergences to emerge. Bottoms, however, are often sharp and “V”-shaped, giving little warning. As a result, while this method can help identify downside risk, it’s far less effective at spotting recoveries or timing market lows.
XBD/SPY & XLP/SPY Relative Strenght

Source: Technical Analysis Explained – Martin J. Pring
Relative Strength (RS) is a technical metric used to evaluate the performance relationship between two securities. In the chart, we compare XBD (Securities Brokers – blue line) and XLP (Consumer Staples – inverted, orange line), both measured relative to the SPY.
Starting with XLP/SPY: XLP represents the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR. The underlying premise is that during bear markets, investors often seek refuge in consumer staples due to their defensive nature. Conversely, in bull markets, these stocks tend to underperform as capital shifts toward higher-growth, more speculative sectors. For this reason, the XLP/SPY line has been plotted in an inverted format, allowing for easier identification of divergences that often signal shifts in investor sentiment.
Now, turning to XBD/SPY: XBD represents the NYSE Arca Securities Broker/Dealer Index. Historically, this index has shown a tendency to lead market tops and bottoms. When the relative strength line peaks and begins to decline or move sideways, it often precedes a change in market trend—though the timing can vary. This change may result in a downturn or simply a period of consolidation. The inverse also holds true, with the index providing useful signals near market bottoms as well.
Monthly Forecasts
DECEMBER
The December forecast suggests a relatively flat month overall, with a period of market indecision expected between the 16th and 18th. The projected directional bias is to the upside, with the month—and the year—anticipated to close with some mild weakness in the final trading days.
DECEMBER’s DOI: 16th-18th.
DOIs: “DOI” refers to “Date of Interest” — a term used to highlight specific days when potential market reversals or periods of heightened volatility may occur. The methodology behind the identification of these dates has not been disclosed in previous publications and will remain confidential in future ones.
Short-Term
S&P500

This chart employs a simple yet effective methodology for identifying theoretical support and resistance zones. It calculates key levels based on fixed percentage moves from both the most recent significant high or low, as well as from the extreme points — either the lowest low or highest high — within the current trend structure. Additionally, it factors in speed deviations, both positive and negative, relative to the prevailing trend. These elements serve to identify potential zones where price action may stall, reverse, or accelerate, providing a structured framework for anticipating significant market reactions.

This chart displays a heat map of potential support and resistance levels derived from open interest in SPX options. The analysis takes into account various option characteristics, including expiration dates, moneyness, and strike distributions. The specific parameters and selection criteria have been determined at the author’s discretion and are not disclosed.
Darker areas on the heat map indicate a higher concentration of open interest, which may signal zones of market sensitivity. It’s worth noting that a significant portion of open interest—particularly in out-of-the-money puts below the current market price—is often used as part of hedging strategies by institutional participants and market makers. While these levels can act as potential areas of support or resistance, they should be interpreted as context rather than certainty, as not all open interest reflects directional intent.
VIX

For the VIX, I primarily focus on trendlines and channels, using closing or opening prices rather than highs or lows. I avoid indicators — the VIX tends to respect structure more than signals. The colored levels on my chart are straightforward: they serve as both support/resistance zones and trigger levels, depending on price behavior.
Summary
Long-Term View
The Decennial Pattern and broader historical annual performance continue to support the outlook for a strong year overall, consistent with market behavior observed thus far. This structural bias aligns with prior cycles where the fifth year of each decade tends to outperform. Similarly, the Kitchin Cycle—a mid-range business cycle of approximately 40 months—suggests a broader upward trajectory is still in play, with the next cyclical peak anticipated around April 2027.
While the Presidential Cycle continues to indicate potential for weakness—particularly typical of the third year of a presidential term—there has yet to be a meaningful correction to validate that risk. As we approach year-end, markets may find some degree of stabilization in December, as is historically common.
The January Barometer, which offers a perspective on how January’s performance can influence the rest of the year, is currently suggesting a slightly negative month ahead. This is expected to play out as an early-month rally followed by a fade into month-end. Meanwhile, the Yearly Market Blueprint supports the idea of a sideways trading pattern through December, with a potential upside bias forming in the second half of the month.
Mid-Term View
Seasonal patterns continue to support a bullish bias. Historically, December has been one of the strongest months for equities, and while we are now at the tail end of it, January has also tended to perform well—albeit statistically less so than December. As we shift into the new year, seasonality remains a constructive backdrop, though with slightly reduced historical tailwinds.
The Dow Jones Utility Index (DJU) also lends some support to the bullish case. It has been moving higher, albeit with minor volatility, and is now approaching a potential cycle peak around January 6, 2026. If this plays out in line with previous patterns, it could signal a less favorable start to the year for equities, suggesting that near-term caution may be warranted.
On the SPX vs. SPX Equal Weight (SPXEW) chart, a subtle yet notable divergence has emerged. While the SPX is pushing toward new all-time highs, SPXEW is lagging—an early signal that market breadth may be narrowing. This kind of divergence has historically preceded periods of consolidation or increased volatility, and it’s worth watching to see if this develops into a broader structural shift.
The outlook on XBD (Broker-Dealer Index) and XLP (Consumer Staples) is more ambiguous. XBD appears to be gradually trending higher, but the move lacks strong conviction. Recent weeks have shown more sideways action with a slight bearish tilt. As for XLP, the picture is similarly unclear. While we’ve seen a higher high, the price action suggests the potential need for another pullback before any meaningful advance—if one is to materialize at all.
Short-Term View
The week began on a positive note with a gap higher, pushing price action above the gradually rising blue trendline—a level that had been acting as a gentle guide for the past several sessions. However, after that initial move, Open Interest (OI) took center stage in shaping price behavior. We’re now approaching a steeper blue trendline—still slower than the broader uptrend—but increasingly relevant in the short term. Just above lie key OI resistance zones, marked by green lines on the chart.
Will the market push through these levels? At this stage, it seems unlikely. The OI map reveals a significant concentration of positions around the $7,000 level—a clean, psychological round number. Not surprisingly, traders have also clustered activity around other round figures like $6,500 and $7,500. That’s typical behavior, as such levels tend to act like magnets for price. Interestingly, we’re also seeing a rise in OI just below current price, suggesting that some participants may be positioning in anticipation of a shift—or at least hedging their bets.
At the moment, the strongest gravitational pull is coming from the OI concentrations above current price. But once those are absorbed or unwound, the OI below could begin to exert more influence—possibly setting the stage for a retracement or period of consolidation.
Lastly, there’s something worth mentioning on the VIX front. As circled on the chart, the VIX has now dipped below its typical “Normal” zone and entered what could be called the “Very Calm” range. Pull up your own chart—regardless of provider—and you’ll notice this isn’t a place it tends to linger. Historically, extended stays in this low-volatility zone are rare and often followed by a spike in volatility or at least a shift in tone. A low VIX means market insurance is cheap—implied volatility is subdued, and options premiums are relatively low. If you’re considering hedging or positioning for potential volatility ahead, the question is: what are you waiting for?
What’s Ahead
As we approach the final trading days of the year, we’re exiting the earnings warning season, and notably, there are no options expirations on the immediate horizon. U.S. markets will be closed on January 1, 2026, in observance of New Year’s Day. With end-of-month flows in play, we may see some portfolio adjustments—particularly tax-related activity. In the final days of December, investors often look to harvest losses by selling underperforming positions. Conversely, in the early days of January, we could see some profit-taking on winners, allowing investors to defer capital gains taxes into the 2026 tax year, payable in 2027.
EVENTS
- 30th December 19:00UTC FOMC Minutes
- 31st December 2025 13:30UTC Initial Jobless Claims
Outlook & Expectations
Looking ahead to next week, the bias remains modestly bullish. That said, some pause or sideways movement wouldn’t be surprising as markets gear down ahead of Christmas. If the upward scenario plays out, it likely takes the form of a slow, possibly uneven climb, with $6,925 as a reasonable upside target. Given the shortened week—early close on the 24th and full closure on the 25th—there’s little reason to expect a push toward the more ambitious $6,985 level. Conversely, if sentiment sours and we see downside pressure, support around $6,720 should hold, barring any surprise catalysts.
The final full trading week of the year kicked off with a solid rally, marked by a gap higher that pushed prices away from the slower-rising blue trendline. The move was notable in its strength early on, but momentum faded once markets reopened after Christmas—almost as if traders were still recovering from holiday indulgence. We closed the week at $6,929, nearly spot-on with the forecasted target of $6,925, which I’d consider well within the margin of an acceptable call. Friday also delivered a fresh all-time high, closing the year on a technically strong note.
As we look ahead to the shortened final week of the year and the start of 2026, it’s time to consider a shift in bias. While retail traders often enter the new year with renewed optimism—driven more by sentiment than positioning—under the surface, institutional behavior may tell a different story. There are technically only three trading days left in December, which leaves a narrow window for tax-loss harvesting, where investors sell losing positions to offset capital gains.
That said, in a year like this—where markets have risen steadily from March onward—losses are scarce. In fact, if someone is sitting on a “loser” in this kind of environment, they’d probably have been better off buying just SPY and skipping individual names altogether. Many stocks have significantly outperformed the index, so it’s reasonable to assume that meaningful tax-loss selling will be limited.
On the other hand, I do expect to see more activity on the tax deferral side. Investors sitting on strong gains may look to trim winners in early January, effectively pushing their capital gains into the 2026 tax year (reportable in 2027). This type of selling pressure, especially in the first few sessions of the new year, could weigh on markets temporarily—even if the broader trend remains constructive.
Technically speaking, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the week start with a continuation higher, potentially testing the faster-rising blue trendline or even reaching the Open Interest resistance level around $6,974. If price stalls or rejects at that level, a pullback scenario becomes plausible. In a more extended downside move, support doesn’t come in immediately—$6,797 could be a potential downside magnet if selling accelerates. If bearish momentum doesn’t materialize, a stall below $6,974 remains the more probable outcome for now.
Finally, time permitting, I plan to publish a full “End of Year” review on January 1st, recapping what worked in 2025, what didn’t, and presenting the initial forecasts for 2026. The January Barometer will, of course, be addressed at the end of next month. If the review isn’t published on the 1st, you can expect the 2026 forecast to be included in next Friday’s regular article.
Wishing you all a strong finish to the year—and a strategic start to the next.
If this article sparked a brain cell or two, you can say ‘Thanks’—ideally while caffeinating and pretending you’ve got this whole Market thing figured out. Consider buying me a coffee. It keeps this site running and caffeine flowing!

























































